score
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) scores 25 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 28
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) scores 25 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 28
output tokens/sec
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) generates output at 59.0 tokens per second (based on Alibaba's API), …
TTFT
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 4. …
/ 1M tokens
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) costs $1.20 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $1. …
/ 1M tokens
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) costs $1.20 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $1. …
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Strong general-purpose model
Suitable for most production tasks, but high-volume or repetitive work should still be compared against cheaper routes.
Routing recommendation
Lower-cost models for repetitive or high-volume work
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Premium pricing — $1.20 / M input, $6.00 / M output. Use cheaper routes for repetitive or low-risk work.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Strong | Intelligence score 25 supports capable reasoning, but very hard tasks may benefit from higher-tier models. | Good for most complex tasks; consider a frontier model for the hardest 10%. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Strong | Output speed 59.0 tokens/sec is adequate for chat. | Suitable for chat; monitor latency under concurrent load. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Moderate | TTFT 4.12s — latency may be noticeable in interactive use. | Consider routing latency-critical paths to faster models. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Moderate | Output pricing at $6.00 is premium. Route high-volume simple tasks to cheaper alternatives. | Use only for high-value tasks; route simple queries to budget models. |
Cost pressure
HighPricing is premium — input $1.20, output $6.00. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) scores 25 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 28).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) generates output at 59.0 tokens per second (based on Alibaba's API), which is below average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 81.2 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is premium — input $1.20, output $6.00. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) scores 25 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 28). Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) generates output at 59.0 tokens per second (based on Alibaba's API), which is below average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 81.2 t/s). Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview) costs $1.20 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $1.50) and $6.00 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $8.40), based on Alibaba's API.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Qwen3 Max Thinking (Preview).
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.