score
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) scores 29 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 9
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) scores 29 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 9
output tokens/sec
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) generates output at 165.8 tokens per second (based on Alibaba's API), …
TTFT
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 2. …
/ 1M tokens
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: …
/ 1M tokens
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: …
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Strong general-purpose model
Suitable for most production tasks, but high-volume or repetitive work should still be compared against cheaper routes.
Routing recommendation
Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Moderate pricing — $0.25 / M input, $2.00 / M output. Costs are manageable, but volume should still be reviewed.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Strong | Intelligence score 29 supports capable reasoning, but very hard tasks may benefit from higher-tier models. | Good for most complex tasks; consider a frontier model for the hardest 10%. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Excellent | Output speed 165.8 tokens/sec and capable intelligence make this suitable for real-time chat at scale. | Ideal for interactive chat; enable caching for repeated queries. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Strong | TTFT 2.12s — adequate latency for most interactive use cases. | Suitable for real-time; test with your specific workload. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Moderate | Output pricing at $2.00 is premium. Route high-volume simple tasks to cheaper alternatives. | Use only for high-value tasks; route simple queries to budget models. |
Cost pressure
MediumPricing is moderate — input $0.25, output $2.00. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) scores 29 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) generates output at 165.8 tokens per second (based on Alibaba's API), which is well above average compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 101.0 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is moderate — input $0.25, output $2.00. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Model size, parameters, and architectural details.
Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) scores 29 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9). Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) generates output at 165.8 tokens per second (based on Alibaba's API), which is well above average compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 101.0 t/s). Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.18) and $2.00 per 1M output tokens (at the higher end, median: $0.40), based on Alibaba's API.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Qwen3.5 35B A3B.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.