score
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B scores 8 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 7
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B scores 8 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 7
output tokens/sec
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B generates output at 301.5 tokens per second (based on the median …
TTFT
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B has a time to first token (TTFT) of 5. …
/ 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B costs $1.20 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, …
/ 1M tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B costs $1.20 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, …
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Budget-friendly / task-specific model
Best for high-volume, simple, or domain-specific tasks where cost or speed matters more than deep reasoning.
Routing recommendation
Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Premium pricing — $1.20 / M input, $1.20 / M output. Use cheaper routes for repetitive or low-risk work.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Weak | Intelligence score 8 is better suited for straightforward tasks than multi-step reasoning. | Avoid routing complex agentic tasks to this model. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Strong | Output speed 301.5 tokens/sec is adequate for chat. | Suitable for chat; monitor latency under concurrent load. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Moderate | TTFT 5.72s — latency may be noticeable in interactive use. | Consider routing latency-critical paths to faster models. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Strong | Output pricing at $1.20 is reasonable for moderate volume. | Suitable for production; review costs as volume grows. |
Cost pressure
HighPricing is premium — input $1.20, output $1.20. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B scores 8 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among other open weight non-reasoning models of similar size (median: 7).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B generates output at 301.5 tokens per second (based on the median across providers serving the model), which is well above average compared to other open weight non-reasoning models of similar size (median: 81.5 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is premium — input $1.20, output $1.20. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Model size, parameters, and architectural details.
Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B scores 8 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among other open weight non-reasoning models of similar size (median: 7). Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B generates output at 301.5 tokens per second (based on the median across providers serving the model), which is well above average compared to other open weight non-reasoning models of similar size (median: 81.5 t/s). Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B costs $1.20 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.53) and $1.20 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $1.05), based on the median across providers serving the model.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.