score
Jamba 1.5 Large scores 5 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at …
vs class avg: 17
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
Jamba 1.5 Large scores 5 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at …
vs class avg: 17
/ 1M tokens
Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens (at the higher end, median: $0.60) and $8. …
/ 1M tokens
Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens (at the higher end, median: $0.60) and $8. …
This profile does not provide this metric.
This profile does not provide this metric.
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Budget-friendly / task-specific model
Best for high-volume, simple, or domain-specific tasks where cost or speed matters more than deep reasoning.
Routing recommendation
Lower-cost models for repetitive or high-volume work
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Premium pricing — $2.00 / M input, $8.00 / M output. Use cheaper routes for repetitive or low-risk work.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Weak | Intelligence score 5 is better suited for straightforward tasks than multi-step reasoning. | Avoid routing complex agentic tasks to this model. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Moderate | Output pricing at $8.00 is premium. Route high-volume simple tasks to cheaper alternatives. | Use only for high-value tasks; route simple queries to budget models. |
Cost pressure
HighPricing is premium — input $2.00, output $8.00. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Jamba 1.5 Large scores 5 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the lower end among other open weight non-reasoning models of similar size (median: 17).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Higher throughput supports faster interactive use.
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is premium — input $2.00, output $8.00. This model is expensive for high-volume or output-heavy workloads.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Model size, parameters, and architectural details.
Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Jamba 1.5 Large scores 5 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the lower end among other open weight non-reasoning models of similar size (median: 17). Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens (at the higher end, median: $0.60) and $8.00 per 1M output tokens (at the higher end, median: $2.40), based on the median across providers serving the model.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Jamba 1.5 Large.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.