score
GPT-5 nano (high) scores 20 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it …
vs class avg: 7
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
GPT-5 nano (high) scores 20 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it …
vs class avg: 7
output tokens/sec
GPT-5 nano (high) generates output at 159.9 tokens per second (based on OpenAI's API), which is …
TTFT
GPT-5 nano (high) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 121.38s (based on OpenAI's API), which is at …
/ 1M tokens
GPT-5 nano (high) costs $0.05 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0.05) and $0. …
/ 1M tokens
GPT-5 nano (high) costs $0.05 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0.05) and $0. …
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Strong general-purpose model
Suitable for most production tasks, but high-volume or repetitive work should still be compared against cheaper routes.
Routing recommendation
Use the fit matrix to compare against cheaper routes when volume rises
Cost pressure
Competitive pricing — $0.05 / M input, $0.40 / M output. Cost pressure is low enough for sustained production use.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Strong | Intelligence score 20 supports capable reasoning, but very hard tasks may benefit from higher-tier models. | Good for most complex tasks; consider a frontier model for the hardest 10%. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Excellent | Output speed 159.9 tokens/sec and capable intelligence make this suitable for real-time chat at scale. | Ideal for interactive chat; enable caching for repeated queries. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Moderate | TTFT 121.38s — latency may be noticeable in interactive use. | Consider routing latency-critical paths to faster models. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Excellent | Output pricing at $0.40 is very competitive for high-volume workloads. | Excellent for budget-constrained pipelines; enable caching to reduce costs further. |
Cost pressure
LowPricing is competitive — input $0.05, output $0.40. Suitable for sustained production use.
No cheaper substitute is supported by the current price data.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
GPT-5 nano (high) scores 20 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 7).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
GPT-5 nano (high) generates output at 159.9 tokens per second (based on OpenAI's API), which is above average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 128.6 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is competitive — input $0.05, output $0.40. Suitable for sustained production use.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
GPT-5 nano (high) scores 20 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 7). GPT-5 nano (high) generates output at 159.9 tokens per second (based on OpenAI's API), which is above average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 128.6 t/s). GPT-5 nano (high) costs $0.05 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0.05) and $0.40 per 1M output tokens (at the higher end, median: $0.20), based on OpenAI's API.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for GPT-5 nano (high).
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.