score
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) scores 18 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 11
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) scores 18 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, …
vs class avg: 11
output tokens/sec
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) generates output at 150.4 tokens per second (based on OpenAI's API), …
TTFT
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 0. …
/ 1M tokens
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0. …
/ 1M tokens
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0. …
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Capable everyday model
Good for routine tasks; route complex reasoning and premium workloads to stronger models.
Routing recommendation
Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Moderate pricing — $0.20 / M input, $1.25 / M output. Costs are manageable, but volume should still be reviewed.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Moderate | Intelligence score 18 handles routine reasoning but may struggle with open-ended agentic tasks. | Route simpler sub-tasks here; keep hard reasoning on a stronger model. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Excellent | Output speed 150.4 tokens/sec and capable intelligence make this suitable for real-time chat at scale. | Ideal for interactive chat; enable caching for repeated queries. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Excellent | TTFT 0.61s — among the lowest latencies, suitable for interactive latency-critical use cases. | Good first choice for real-time applications. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Strong | Output pricing at $1.25 is reasonable for moderate volume. | Suitable for production; review costs as volume grows. |
Cost pressure
MediumPricing is moderate — input $0.20, output $1.25. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) scores 18 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 11).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) generates output at 150.4 tokens per second (based on OpenAI's API), which is well above average compared to other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 95.5 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is moderate — input $0.20, output $1.25. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) scores 18 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 11). GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) generates output at 150.4 tokens per second (based on OpenAI's API), which is well above average compared to other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 95.5 t/s). GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) costs $0.20 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $0.20) and $1.25 per 1M output tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.70), based on OpenAI's API.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for GPT-5.4 nano.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.