Intelligence
29
score
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) scores 29 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well …
vs class avg: 9
Google•Open weights•April 2, 2026
Gemma 4 31B
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Source:Artificial Analysis scrapeType:Open weights
Speed
34.4
output tokens/sec
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) generates output at 34.4 tokens per second (based on Google's API), which …
Latency
1.00s
TTFT
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 1. …
Input Price#1/130
$0.00
Output Price#1/130
$0.00
Decision Overview
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Strong general-purpose model
Suitable for most production tasks, but high-volume or repetitive work should still be compared against cheaper routes.
Best for
- Code generation
- Content analysis
- Structured extraction
- Customer-facing chat
- Interactive turn-taking
Weak or unsuitable
- Extremely long-context tasks
- Ultra-low-latency requirements
Routing recommendation
1
Use the fit matrix to compare against cheaper routes when volume rises
Cost pressure
Competitive pricing — $0.00 / M input, $0.00 / M output. Cost pressure is low enough for sustained production use.
Model-fit matrix
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Strong | Intelligence score 29 supports capable reasoning, but very hard tasks may benefit from higher-tier models. | Good for most complex tasks; consider a frontier model for the hardest 10%. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Moderate | Output speed may be a bottleneck for real-time chat at scale. | Consider a faster model for latency-sensitive chat. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Strong | TTFT 1.00s — adequate latency for most interactive use cases. | Suitable for real-time; test with your specific workload. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Excellent | Output pricing at $0.00 is very competitive for high-volume workloads. | Excellent for budget-constrained pipelines; enable caching to reduce costs further. |
Cost pressure
LowPricing is competitive — input $0.00, output $0.00. Suitable for sustained production use.
Cheaper substitutes
No cheaper substitute is supported by the current price data.
Route away when
- Extreme scale where even low costs matter
Highlights
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Intelligence position
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) scores 29 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9).
Speed
Speed position
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) generates output at 34.4 tokens per second (based on Google's API), which is at the lower end compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 101.8 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Price/value position
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is competitive — input $0.00, output $0.00. Suitable for sustained production use.
Intelligence & Quality
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Speed & Throughput
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Speed should be read together with latency and cost; fast output does not always mean better user-perceived performance.
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Speed should be read together with latency and cost; fast output does not always mean better user-perceived performance.
Latency & Response Time
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Latency: Time To First Answer Token
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Latency includes thinking / reasoning time when applicable. Lower is better for interactive use cases.
Context, Cost & Pricing
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context Window
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Larger context windows enable complex multi-turn tasks but may increase latency and cost for long inputs.
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Cost per Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Architecture & Scale
Model size, parameters, and architectural details.
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Larger models generally perform better but cost more to serve. Active parameter count matters for inference efficiency.
Additional Benchmarks
Further benchmark and comparison data.
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Specifications
Technical Specifications
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) scores 29 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9). Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) generates output at 34.4 tokens per second (based on Google's API), which is at the lower end compared to other open weight models of similar size (median: 101.8 t/s).
Gemma 4 31B
- Model type
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Input modalities
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) supports text, image, and video input.
- Output modalities
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) supports text output.
- Context window
- 260k tokens
- Open weights / source
- Yes, Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is open weights. The model weights are publicly available and can be downloaded for self-hosting.
- Parameters
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) has 30.7 billion parameters.
- License
- Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is released under the Apache 2.0 license. This license allows commercial use.
- API availability
- Yes, Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is available via API through 12 providers.
Methodology & Provenance
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Gemma 4 31B.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.
Source file: md/scrape/artificial_analysis_model_pages/artificialanalysis_ai__models__gemma-4-31b__c4e364d19d.html · Canonical URL: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemma-4-31b
Normalized at: 2026-07-08T03:24:56+00:00 Technical specs, comparison summary, and FAQs are passed through from the normalized data without rewriting.
Ranks shown on summary cards come directly from the normalized profile. No rank or class display is synthesized in the renderer.
Visible FAQ answers and FAQ JSON-LD are emitted from the same normalized FAQ array, so structured data stays aligned with the rendered accordion.
Time per Intelligence Index Task: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemma-4-31b
Frequently Asked Questions
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) was released on April 2, 2026.
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) was created by Google.
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) scores 29 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other open weight models of similar size (median: 9).