score
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) scores 38 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence …
vs class avg: 28
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) scores 38 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence …
vs class avg: 28
output tokens/sec
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) generates output at 176.0 tokens per second (based on Google's …
TTFT
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) has a time to first token (TTFT) of 7. …
/ 1M tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) costs $0.50 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $1. …
/ 1M tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) costs $0.50 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $1. …
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Frontier research / complex reasoning
Reserve this model for the hardest requests; simpler or repetitive work should stay on cheaper routes.
Routing recommendation
Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Moderate pricing — $0.50 / M input, $3.00 / M output. Costs are manageable, but volume should still be reviewed.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Excellent | Intelligence score 38 places this model among top performers. Suitable for multi-step analysis and agentic loops. | Route complex tasks here; reserve simpler queries for cheaper models. |
| High-volume chat & customer-facing | Excellent | Output speed 176.0 tokens/sec and capable intelligence make this suitable for real-time chat at scale. | Ideal for interactive chat; enable caching for repeated queries. |
| Latency-sensitive applications | Moderate | TTFT 7.99s — latency may be noticeable in interactive use. | Consider routing latency-critical paths to faster models. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Moderate | Output pricing at $3.00 is premium. Route high-volume simple tasks to cheaper alternatives. | Use only for high-value tasks; route simple queries to budget models. |
Cost pressure
MediumPricing is moderate — input $0.50, output $3.00. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) scores 38 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 28).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) generates output at 176.0 tokens per second (based on Google's API), which is well above average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 81.2 t/s).
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is moderate — input $0.50, output $3.00. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Time to first token and end-to-end response latency.
Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) scores 38 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 28). Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) generates output at 176.0 tokens per second (based on Google's API), which is well above average compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 81.2 t/s). Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) costs $0.50 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $1.50) and $3.00 per 1M output tokens (very competitive, median: $8.40), based on Google's API.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Gemini 3 Flash.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.