score
Claude 3 Haiku scores 4 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at …
vs class avg: 11
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
score
Claude 3 Haiku scores 4 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at …
vs class avg: 11
/ 1M tokens
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.20) and $1. …
/ 1M tokens
Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.20) and $1. …
This profile does not provide this metric.
This profile does not provide this metric.
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Budget-friendly / task-specific model
Best for high-volume, simple, or domain-specific tasks where cost or speed matters more than deep reasoning.
Routing recommendation
Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Moderate pricing — $0.25 / M input, $1.25 / M output. Costs are manageable, but volume should still be reviewed.
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Weak | Intelligence score 4 is better suited for straightforward tasks than multi-step reasoning. | Avoid routing complex agentic tasks to this model. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Strong | Output pricing at $1.25 is reasonable for moderate volume. | Suitable for production; review costs as volume grows. |
Cost pressure
MediumPricing is moderate — input $0.25, output $1.25. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Claude 3 Haiku scores 4 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the lower end among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 11).
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Higher throughput supports faster interactive use.
Context, Cost & Pricing
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is moderate — input $0.25, output $1.25. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Claude 3 Haiku scores 4 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it at the lower end among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 11). Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per 1M input tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.20) and $1.25 per 1M output tokens (somewhat higher than average, median: $0.70), based on the median across providers serving the model.
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Claude 3 Haiku.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.