Intelligence
12
score
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores 12 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average …
vs class avg: 17
Anthropic•Open weights•October 22, 2024
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis
Source:Artificial Analysis scrapeType:Open weights
Input Price
$0.80
/ 1M tokens
Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $1.88) and $4. …
Output Price
$4.00
/ 1M tokens
Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $1.88) and $4. …
Speed
not provided
This profile does not provide this metric.
Latency
not provided
This profile does not provide this metric.
Decision Overview
Ethen's intelligence-driven routing assessment for this model
Overall verdict
Capable everyday model
Good for routine tasks; route complex reasoning and premium workloads to stronger models.
Best for
- Routine Q&A
- Content summarization
- Classification
- Light coding
Weak or unsuitable
- Complex reasoning
- Agentic workflows
- Research-grade analysis
- Predictable high-volume throughput
Routing recommendation
1
Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
2
Cache-backed reuse for repeated prompts
Cost pressure
Moderate pricing — $0.80 / M input, $4.00 / M output. Costs are manageable, but volume should still be reviewed.
Model-fit matrix
Use this model where capability pays for itself; route away where volume, latency, or budget dominate.
| Use case | Fit | Reason | Routing note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complex reasoning & agentic workflows | Moderate | Intelligence score 12 handles routine reasoning but may struggle with open-ended agentic tasks. | Route simpler sub-tasks here; keep hard reasoning on a stronger model. |
| Cost-sensitive pipelines | Moderate | Output pricing at $4.00 is premium. Route high-volume simple tasks to cheaper alternatives. | Use only for high-value tasks; route simple queries to budget models. |
Cost pressure
MediumPricing is moderate — input $0.80, output $4.00. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Cheaper substitutes
- Cheaper routes for predictable extraction, labeling, or summarization
Route away when
- Predictable high-volume throughput
- Non-critical classification and extraction
Highlights
Key benchmark results at a glance.
Intelligence
Intelligence position
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores 12 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 17).
Speed
Speed position
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Higher throughput supports faster interactive use.
Context, Cost & Pricing
Price/value position
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Pricing is moderate — input $0.80, output $4.00. Costs accumulate at volume but are manageable for valuable tasks.
Intelligence & Quality
Benchmark scores and quality indices measuring model capability.
AA-Omniscience Index
AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Speed & Throughput
Output tokens per second and generation throughput.
Speed
Output tokens per second · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Speed should be read together with latency and cost; fast output does not always mean better user-perceived performance.
Context, Cost & Pricing
Context window size, cost per task, and token pricing.
Context Window
Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Larger context windows enable complex multi-turn tasks but may increase latency and cost for long inputs.
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Cost per Task
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Higher values indicate stronger overall capability. Bars show how models compare on composite intelligence metrics.
Ethen Gateway should route away from this model when the task is simple, repetitive, or likely to generate many output tokens.
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Price (USD per M Tokens) · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis
Source and methodology are summarized below
Chart source and provenance are listed in Methodology & sources below.
Bars intentionally show many models at once so the page feels like a benchmark report rather than a dashboard.
Specifications
Technical Specifications
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores 12 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 17). Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $1.88) and $4.00 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $7.75), based on the median across providers serving the model.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
- Model type
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- No
- Input modalities
- Claude 3.5 Haiku supports image input.
- Output modalities
- Claude 3.5 Haiku supports text only output.
- Context window
- 200k tokens
- Open weights / source
- No, Claude 3.5 Haiku is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.
- Parameters
- Claude 3.5 Haiku is a proprietary model and Anthropic has not disclosed the model size or parameter count.
- Knowledge cutoff
- Claude 3.5 Haiku has a knowledge cutoff of July 2024. The model's training data includes information up to this date.
- API availability
- Yes, Claude 3.5 Haiku is available via API through 2 providers.
Methodology & Provenance
This page is rendered from the normalized profile and page JSON for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Benchmark values are preserved as normalized; only layout, disclosure ordering, and typography are adjusted for readability.
Source file: md/scrape/artificial_analysis_model_pages/artificialanalysis_ai__models__claude-3-5-haiku__b2fd622adc.html · Canonical URL: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/claude-3-5-haiku
Normalized at: 2026-07-08T03:24:56+00:00 Technical specs, comparison summary, and FAQs are passed through from the normalized data without rewriting.
Visible FAQ answers and FAQ JSON-LD are emitted from the same normalized FAQ array, so structured data stays aligned with the rendered accordion.
Speed: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/claude-3-5-haiku
Frequently Asked Questions
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on October 22, 2024.
Claude 3.5 Haiku was created by Anthropic.
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores 12 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it below average among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 17).